Difference between revisions of "Mistakes discussion"

From TQAuditor Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(→‎Arbiter reviews the project)
 
(5 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
''Mistakes discussion page: [http://cloud.tqauditor.com/evaluation/index?id=XXXX/ http://cloud.tqauditor.com/evaluation/index?id=XXXX] (replace XXXX with a valid number)''
+
*[[Mistakes discussion: in general|In general]]
−
----
 
  
 +
*[[Mistakes discussion for translator| For translator]]
  
−
When project evaluator finishes assessing the translation quality (<u>[[Evaluation report|completes evaluation]]</u>), project translator gets email notification.
+
*[[Mistakes discussion for evaluator| For evaluator]]
  
−
=='''Translator reviews the quality feedback'''==
+
*[[Mistakes discussion for arbiter| For arbiter]]
−
 
 
−
After the translator has received the email with the translation quality evaluation, the translator should:
 
−
 
 
−
1. View <u>[[Comparison report| Comparison report tab]]</u>. Look through all the corrections made by the editor.
 
−
 
 
−
2. Go to <u>[[Evaluation report| Evaluation report]]</u>.
 
−
 
 
−
3. Look through classification of each mistake.
 
−
 
 
−
If the translator agrees with classification of all the mistakes, (s)he presses '''Complete project'''.
 
−
 
 
−
The project and its evaluation score are finalized at this stage.
 
−
 
 
−
If the translator does not agree with classification of some mistakes, (s)he presses '''Add Comment'''
 
−
 
 
−
in the box of the mistake that (s)he does not agree with and enters it clicking '''Submit''':
 
−
 
 
−
[[File:Mistakes discussion-1.png|Mistakes discussion: the translator leaves the comment]]
 
−
 
−
When the translator has entered all the comments, (s)he sends the project for reevaluation by pressing '''Request reevaluation''':
 
−
 
 
−
[[File:Mistakes discussion-2.png|Request reevaluation]]
 
−
 
−
The project will be sent to the evaluator, who will review translator’s comments.
 
−
 
 
−
If they are convincing, the evaluator will change the mistake severity in translator’s favor.
 
−
 
 
−
The translator will receive the reevaluated project. The translator can send this project for reevaluation one more time.
 
−
 
 
−
If the translator has not reached an agreement with the evaluator, (s)he can send the project to the arbiter by pressing '''Request arbitration''' (it appears instead of '''Request reevaluation''').
 
−
 
 
−
The arbiter will provide a final score that cannot be disputed.
 
−
 
 
−
=='''Evaluator reviews the translator's comments'''==
 
−
 
 
−
At this stage, the evaluator needs to review all the translator’s comments with objections. The evaluator has the following instructions:
 
−
 
 
−
1. If the translator is right, the evaluator changes mistake severity and enters the comment why it has been changed.
 
−
 
 
−
If the translator is wrong, the evaluator enters the comment why the mistake's severity has not been changed.
 
−
 
 
−
2. To finish, the evaluator presses '''Complete reevaluation'''. The project will be sent to the translator for review.
 
−
 
 
−
=='''Arbiter reviews the project'''==
 
−
 
 
−
Unless the system has been set up otherwise, the translator can return the project to the evaluator for 2 times.
 
−
 
 
−
If the translator and the evaluator have not managed to reach the agreement after 2 attempts, the translator sends the project to the arbiter.
 
−
 
 
−
The user, who was assigned to be the arbiter will be notified by the system.
 
−
 
 
−
The arbiter has to assign a final score on the disputed matters.  S(he) looks through all the rows where the translator and evaluator disagree.
 
−
 
 
−
If the translator is right, the arbiter changes the mistake severity and enters his(er) comment why it has been changed.
 
−
 
 
−
If the translator is wrong, the arbiter enters the comment why the mistake severity has not been changed.
 
−
 
 
−
[[File:Mistakes discussion-3.png|The arbiter leaves the comment]]
 
−
 
−
Finally, the arbiter should press '''Complete project'''. The project will be finalized and all its participants will receive the respective message.
 
−
 
 
−
[[File:Mistakes discussion-5.png|The arbiter completes the project]]
 

Latest revision as of 09:46, 15 December 2017