Difference between revisions of "Quality score formula"
From TQAuditor Wiki
(→Quality score calculation examples) |
(→Quality score calculation examples) |
||
| (8 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 69: | Line 69: | ||
[[File:QSA.png|border|300px]] | [[File:QSA.png|border|300px]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | ---- | ||
===Manual word count=== | ===Manual word count=== | ||
| Line 75: | Line 77: | ||
;File details: | ;File details: | ||
:Total source words: 3126 | :Total source words: 3126 | ||
| − | :Fully reviewed: | + | :Fully reviewed: no |
| + | :Number of words in a reviewed part of the file: around 1500 | ||
:Number of units (segments): 392 | :Number of units (segments): 392 | ||
:Project specialization - marketing | :Project specialization - marketing | ||
;Evaluation settings: | ;Evaluation settings: | ||
| − | + | :Evaluated source words: 1500<br /> | |
;Evaluation details: | ;Evaluation details: | ||
| − | : | + | :Corrected units: 227 |
| − | : | + | :Total source words: 1500 |
'''Mistakes:''' | '''Mistakes:''' | ||
| Line 106: | Line 109: | ||
;Quality score calculation: | ;Quality score calculation: | ||
| + | Using the [[Quality_score_formula#Quality_score_formula_visualisation_and_interpretation|formula]]: | ||
| + | 100-(12.34/1500*1000)=91.77 | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[File:QSM.png|border|300px]] | ||
Latest revision as of 15:20, 28 January 2022
Contents
Quality score formula visualisation and interpretation
- 1. Account score limit
- The highest possible score (100 by default). Can be set on this page: [Evaluation settings]
- 2. Mistake severity score
- Score of mistake by its severity (for example, 1 point for minor and 5 points for major mistakes). Can be set on this page: [Mistake severities list]
- 3. Mistake type weight
- Weight of a specific mistake type by specialization. Can be adjusted on this page [Mistake types list]
- 4. SUM
- A sum of products of #2 and #3 for all the mistakes.
- 5. Project evaluation word count
- Automatic word count: The value from the "Total source words" field in the "Evaluation details" section (not the Total source words of a file). Please see the Automatic vs. manual word count page.
- Manual word count: The value from the "Evaluated source words" field (specified when starting the evaluation with a manual word count).
- 6. 1000
- In the end, the result is always converted to 1000, a most optimal value.
The mistake severity scores, mistake type weights, and reports are based on this 1000-word amount. For example, a critical mistake with score of 20 with weight coefficient of 1 reduces the quality score by 20 per 1000 words (by 10 per 2000 words, accordingly, and so on).
For more information, please check the Quality score formula:Details and versions page.
Quality score calculation examples
In the examples below, the following quality standard is used:
Automatic word count
- File details:
- Total source words: 3126
- Fully reviewed: yes
- Number of units (segments): 392
- Project specialization - marketing
- Evaluation settings:
- Evaluation details:
- Total source words: 1749
- Source words in corrected units: 1002
Mistakes:
- Major (3 points each):
- Terminology: 1 (weight coefficient 1)
- Grammar: 1 (weight coefficient 1.2)
- Minor (1 point each):
- Grammar: 3 (weight coefficient 1.2)
- Functional: 2 (weight coefficient 1)
- Repetitive (0.01 point each):
- Functional: 6 (weight coefficient 1)
- Layout: 8 (weight coefficient 1)
- Non-scoring (0 points each):
- Style: 5 (weight coefficient 1.2)
- Terminology: 3 (weight coefficient 1)
- Total mistakes: 29
- SUM: 1*3*1+1*3*1.2+3*1*1.2+2*1*1+6*0.01*1+8*0.01*1+5*0*1.2+3*0*1=3+3.6+3.6+2+0.06+0.08+0+0=12.34
- Quality score calculation:
Using the formula: 100-(12.34/1749*1000)=92.94
Manual word count
- File details:
- Total source words: 3126
- Fully reviewed: no
- Number of words in a reviewed part of the file: around 1500
- Number of units (segments): 392
- Project specialization - marketing
- Evaluation settings:
- Evaluated source words: 1500
- Evaluation details:
- Corrected units: 227
- Total source words: 1500
Mistakes:
- Major (3 points each):
- Terminology: 1 (weight coefficient 1)
- Grammar: 1 (weight coefficient 1.2)
- Minor (1 point each):
- Grammar: 3 (weight coefficient 1.2)
- Functional: 2 (weight coefficient 1)
- Repetitive (0.01 point each):
- Functional: 6 (weight coefficient 1)
- Layout: 8 (weight coefficient 1)
- Non-scoring (0 points each):
- Style: 5 (weight coefficient 1.2)
- Terminology: 3 (weight coefficient 1)
- Total mistakes: 29
- SUM: 1*3*1+1*3*1.2+3*1*1.2+2*1*1+6*0.01*1+8*0.01*1+5*0*1.2+3*0*1=3+3.6+3.6+2+0.06+0.08+0+0=12.34
- Quality score calculation:
Using the formula: 100-(12.34/1500*1000)=91.77
